data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4dd5/b4dd53aaf2bd9ca7233d338aba939a4993073a44" alt="\"Heather"
{"id":1786,"date":"2021-09-13T16:05:53","date_gmt":"2021-09-13T06:05:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/primaryforestsandclimate.org\/?post_type=publications&p=1786"},"modified":"2022-11-16T11:13:13","modified_gmt":"2022-11-16T01:13:13","slug":"reforming-carbon-accounting-to-support-of-nature-based-solutions","status":"publish","type":"publications","link":"https:\/\/primaryforestsandclimate.org\/publications\/reforming-carbon-accounting-to-support-of-nature-based-solutions\/","title":{"rendered":"Policy brief: Reforming carbon accounting to support of nature-based solutions"},"content":{"rendered":"
The core problem is that data reported under the UNFCCC for net emissions and removals related to human activities are insufficient for the understanding of the carbon dynamics of ecosystems. Hence, nature-based solutions for mitigation activities do not reflect their full potential.<\/p>\n
Download policy brief<\/a><\/p>\n The inadequacies of current carbon accounting create perverse outcomes, which encourage forest degradation, including the:<\/p>\n Accounting for\u00a0carbon stocks in ecosystems as their long-term\u00a0average at the landscape scale remains the key metric\u00a0by which to assess the exchange between the\u00a0biosphere and atmosphere. Monitoring\u00a0variability in flows of emissions and removals over time\u00a0is not adequate.<\/p>\n Climate change\u00a0depends on the total stock of carbon dioxide\u00a0in the atmosphere and the increase that has\u00a0occurred due to transfers from the geocarbon\u00a0and biocarbon reservoirs - not that which is only recorded in existing UNFCCC inventories.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div> The System of Environmental Economic Accounting - Ecosystem Accounting<\/a>\u00a0(SEEA EA) framework presents a holistic and comprehensive approach to carbon accounting\u00a0for stocks and flows. It can better enable the effectiveness\u00a0of nature based solutions \u00a0for climate change mitigation to\u00a0be fully evaluated and then prioritised.<\/p>\n SEEA EA accounts for:<\/p>\n Vardon, M., Obst, C., and Houghton, R.A.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div> Keith, H., Vardon, M., Obst, C.,\u00a0Young, V., Houghton, RA., and\u00a0Mackey, B. (2021). Reforming\u00a0Carbon Accounting to Support\u00a0Nature-based Solutions, Griffith\u00a0Climate Action Beacon Science\u00a0Informing Policy Briefing Note 1\/21,\u00a0pp. 1-5. Brisbane, Australia: Griffith\u00a0University.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.25904\/1912\/4508<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Nature-based solutions provide opportunities for climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation and ameliorating environmental degradation. But those opportunities are not materialising as current carbon accounting is deficient for use in evaluating them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":[6,30,39],"featured_media":1796,"menu_order":0,"template":"","format":"standard","researchfield":[81,14],"publicationtype":[72],"case_study":[48],"class_list":["post-1786","publications","type-publications","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","researchfield-biodiversity_conservation","researchfield-forest-carbon-accounting","publicationtype-policy-papers","author-brendan-mackey","author-heather-keith","author-virginia-young","case_study-global"],"yoast_head":"\n\n
\nfast-growing forests;<\/li>\n
\nthese stocks will only occur decades into\u00a0the future, thus creating a\u00a0carbon debt; and<\/li>\nAn alternative approach<\/h3>\n
\n
\n\u2022 ecosystem carbon stocks assessed;<\/li>\nArticle authors<\/h2>
<\/a><\/div>
Heather Keith<\/a><\/h3>
<\/a><\/div>
Brendan Mackey<\/a><\/h3>
<\/a><\/div>
Virginia Young<\/a><\/h3>
Additional authors<\/h2>\n
Reference<\/h3>\n